The social influence motivating middle-aged Germans to purchase sustainable clothes

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the social influence motivating middle-aged Germans to purchase sustainable clothes. 267 respondents participated in this research. Two focus groups were divided. The first group is determined as individuals being interested and the second group not being interested in sustainable clothes. In the first part an indicator for a trend for sustainable clothes is detected. The second part analyzes the social needs and forces that are determined to be the independent variables of this conclusive research. The final part comprises of an open question to determine the popularity of certifications, which label sustainable clothes.

Findings highlight that 60.7% of the respondents are interested in sustainable clothes. The esteem needs are the most influencing. In contrast, the confirmation needs are the least influencing social forces. However, all three independent variables have great influence on the motivation to purchase sustainable clothes. The independent sample t-test with p values between 0.000 and <0.05 implies that there is a significant difference between both analyzed groups.

However, despite over 60% of respondents are interested in sustainable clothes, only 16.01% of the respondents were able to mention a certification label for sustainable clothes. This discovery leads to the knowledge that there is a lack of popularity of certification labels.

Key words: Social Influence, Motivation, Sustainable Clothes, Germany

https://doi.org/10.26459/jed.v126i5B.4120
PDF

References

  1. Upadhyay, G., & Deodya, S. (2011). Eco-Textile:path to sustainable environmental development. Asian Journal of Home Science , 103-106.
  2. European Commission. (2016, Feburary 11). Paris Agreement. Retrieved February 17, 2016, from European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/international/negotiations/future/index_en.htm
  3. Egan, J. (2007). Marketing Communications. London: Thomson Learning.
  4. Focus. (2014, April 23). „Slow Fashion“: Nachhaltige Mode ist in! . Retrieved December 02, 2016, from Focus Online: http://www.focus.de/kultur/vermischtes/slow-fashion-slow-fashion-nachhaltige-mode-ist-in_id_3794499.html
  5. Jung, C. (2011). The Importance of Business Ethics and Sustainability Within Supply Chains (1 ed.). Norderstedt, Germany: GRIN Verlag.
  6. Jackson, P. T. (2005). Motivating Sustainable Consumption. Guildford: Centre of Environmental Strategy.
  7. Jägel, T., Keeling, K., Reppel, A., & Gruber, T. (2012). Individual values and motivational complexities in ethical clothing consumption: A means-end approach. Journal of Marketing Management , 28, 373-396.
  8. Johnston, P., Everard, M., Santillo, D., & Robèrt, K.-H. (2007). Reclaiming the Definition of Sustainability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International , 14, 60-66.
  9. King, P. W. (2009). Climbing Maslow's Pyramid. Leicester: Troubador Publishing Ltd.
  10. Kim, H.-S., & Damhorst, M. L. (1998). Environmental Concern and Apparel Consumption. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal , 126-133.
  11. Lundblad, L., & Davies, I. A. (2015). The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption. Journal of Consumer Behaviour .
  12. Löwenstein, M. (23, October 2012). Ein schwieriger Stoff. Retrieved December 14, 2016, from Zeit Online: http://www.zeit.de/lebensart/mode/2012-10/gruene-mode/komplettansicht
  13. Maxwill, P. (2015, December 3). Nachhaltige Mode: Es geht noch billiger als mit Billigklamotten. Retrieved April 20, 2016, from http://www.spiegel.de: http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/service/nachhaltige-mode-faire-kleidung-tauschen-upcyclen-sparen-a-1064166.html
  14. Mason, W. (2007). IMPLICIT SOCIAL INFLUENCE. Indiana: ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
  15. McLeod, S. S. (2008). SimplyPsychology. Retrieved February 25, 2016, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/: http://staffweb.hawthorn73.org/feinberge/wp-content/uploads/sites/216/2014/10/Social-Identity-Theory-Simply-Psychology.pdf
  16. Parasuraman, A., Grewal, D., & Krishnan, R. (2007). Marketing Research (2 ed.). Boston: George T. Hoffman.
  17. Schmitz-Hoffmann, C., & Schwesig-Simac, A. (2014, Januray). Nachhatliger Konsum - Wie wir als Verbraucher Verantwortung übernehmen können. nahdran , 12-16.
  18. Singh, R., & Mangat, N. S. (1996). Elements of Survey Sampling. Punjap, India: Springer-Science+Business Media, B.V.
  19. TextilWirtschaft. (2011, December 21). TextilWirtschaft: Fast jeder Zweite lässt sich Nachhaltigkeit etwas kosten. Retrieved December 12, 2016, from Presseportal: http://www.presseportal.de/pm/55751/2169694