• Bui Phu Hung Đại Học Tài Chính-Marketing


Many research studies have been conducted on how to teach English effectively. One option is the application of cognitive linguistics, which has provided language educators with many implications for ELT. However, despite studies conducted on the use of this theoretical linguistic perspective in teaching several grammatical items, the teaching of prepositions still remains relatively intact, probably because of a view of this word class as a group of items with ‘empty’ content. Additionally, many academic institutions in Vietnam still use traditional grammar instruction in teaching noun plurality. This paper is to suggest how to apply cognitive linguistics to teaching these two grammar points.

Author Biography

Bui Phu Hung, Đại Học Tài Chính-Marketing

Giảng viên, NCS


Archard, M., Grammatical instruction in the natural approach: A cognitive grammar view. In Archard, M. & Niemeier, S., Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004.

Boers, F. & Lindstromberg, S., Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, eds. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer, 2008.

Chomsky, N., Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1965.

Chomsky, N., Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.

Collins, P. & Hollo, C., English Grammar: An Introduction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

Croft, W., Parts of speech as language universals and as language-particular categories. In Petra, M. V. & Bernard, C., Approaches to the Typology of Word Classes (eds).

Ellis, N., Cognitive approaches to SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics (19), pp. 22-42, 1999.

Evans, V. & Green, M., Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hyams, N., An Introduction to Language (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth, 2003.

Holme, R., Cognitive Linguistics and Language Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

Krashen, S., The Input Hypothesis. London: Longman, 1985.

Król-Markefka, A. Effects of Applying Cognitive Grammar in the Classroom. Neofilolog (35), pp. 207-220, 2010a.

Langacker, R. W., Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical Prerequisites (Vol. 1). Standford: Standford University Press, 1987.

Langacker, R. W., Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Janssen, T. & Redeker, G., Cognitive Linguisitcs: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology (eds.). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999a.

Langacker, R. W., Cognitive grammar as a basis for language instruction. InRobinson, P. & Ellis, N. C., Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition (eds), pp. 66-88. New York: Routledge, 2008b.

Littlemore, J., Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009.

Nguyen, T. H., Vietnamese Learners Mastering English Articles. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Groningen, 2005.

Pawlak, M., The Place of Form-Focused Instruction in the Foreign Language Classroom. Kalisz: Wydzial Pedagogiczno-Artystyczny UAM, 2006.

Pienemann, M., Processability theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J., Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 137-154, 2007.

Schmidt, R., Attention. In Robinson, P., Cognition and Second Language Instruction (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-32, 2001.

Taylor, J. R., Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Taylor, J. R., Cognitive Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thornbury, S., How to Teach Grammar, Harlow: Pearson Education, 2012.





Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities