ROLES OF ECOTOURISM IN HOUSEHOLD INCOME IMPROVEMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES PROTECTION IN TAM GIANG LAGOON OF QUANG LOI COMMUNE, QUANG DIEN DISTRICT, THUA THIEN HUE PROVINCE
PDF

Keywords

Du lịch sinh thái; Đầm phá Tam Giang; Dịch vụ du lịch sinh thái ecotourism
Tam Giang lagoon
tourism service

Abstract

This study was conducted to reinforce that ecotourism in Quang Loi commune’s lagoon creates differences in income and lagoon resource protection from different beneficiary groups. The data were collected from secondary sources, three key informant interviews, and 62 households in three groups: tourism service, fishery, and aquaculture. The results reveal that ecotourism services in Quang Loi commune started in 2010 and have thrived since 2017, relying on the advantages of the local natural resources. The local community organizes and provides tourism services such as sightseeing on the lagoon, fishing experiences, dining and accommodation, and other services. By joining such services, labourers in ecotourism service households earn 39.07 million VND a year, significantly improving the household’s income. The ecotourism service households, therefore, have a higher income than the other groups (85.15 compared with 72.29 and 60 million VND). The lagoon environmental protection activities, such as lagoon night patrol, waste collection, and propaganda and advocating for lagoon environmental protection, receive more attention from the local community. Similarly, there is significantly longer participation of tourism service households in the above activities in comparison with the rest groups. The lagoon environment and resources are improved by residents. This result implies that ecotourism development is a suitable strategy for improving the local people's livelihood and protecting Tam Giang lagoon resources.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijard.v129i3C.6138
PDF

References

  1. Anup, K. C., Rijal K. and Sapkota R. P. (2015), Role of ecotourism in environmental conservation and socioeconomic development in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal, International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(3), 251–258.
  2. Aryal C. and Maharjan K. K. (2018), Assessment of Ecotourism Potential of Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Eastern Nepal, Journal of Tourism & Adventure, 1(1), 48–67.
  3. Bansal S. P. and Kumar J. (2011), Ecotourism for Community Development: A Stakeholder’s Perspective in Great Himalayan National Park, International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development, 2(2), 31–40.
  4. Clifton J. and Benson A. (2006), Planning for Sustainable Ecotourism: The Case for Research Ecotourism in Developing Country Destinations, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14(3), 238–254.
  5. Degang W. and Xiaoting H. (2006), Coincidence and Upgrade: A Typical Case Study of Rural Ecotourism Development, Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 4(1), 45–53.
  6. Department of Capture Fisheries and Resources Protection of Thua Thien Hue province (2019), Report on the Implementation of Aquatic Protected Area Management in 2019 and the Plan for 2020, Thua Thien Hue.
  7. Nguyen Hong Giap (2002), Travel Economics (Book), Young Press, Ho Chi Minh City.
  8. Le Van Hoai (2017), Solutions to develop ecotourism in Ke Go lake nature reserve, Ha Tinh province, Journal of Science, Hue University, 126 (5D), 205–218.
  9. Hunt C. A., William H. D., Laura D. and Martha H. (2015), Can ecotourism deliver real economic, social, and environmental benefits? A study of the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(3), 339–357.
  10. Khanal L. (2019), Contribution of Ecotourism on household income: A study from Buffer zone of Shivapuri Nagarjun National Park, Nepal, North American Academic Research, 2(12), 220–231.
  11. Kiper T. (2013), Role of Ecotourism in Sustainable Development (Book chapter), Namık Kemal University, Turkey.
  12. Linsheng, Z., Buckley, R. & Ting, X. (2007), Chinese perspectives on tourism eco-certification, Annals of Tourism Research, 34(3), 808–811.
  13. Mehta, J. N. & Heinen, J. T. (2001), Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal, Environmental Management, 28(2), 165–177.
  14. Mitchell, J. & Ashley, C. (2010), Tourism and poverty reduction: Pathways to prosperity, London: Earthscan.
  15. Muchapondwa, E. (2003), The Economics of Community-Based Wildlife Conservation in Zimbabwe, Ph.D. Thesis, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.
  16. People's Committee of Quang Loi Commune (2019), Quang Loi socio-economic report 2019.
  17. Roe, D. and Elliott, J. (2006), Pro-poor conservation: The elusive win-win for conservation and poverty reduction? Policy Matters, 14, 53–63.
  18. Schellhorn M. (2010), Development for Whom? Social Justice and the Business of Ecotourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(1), 115–135.
  19. Shibia, M. G. (2010), Determinants of attitudes and perceptions on resource use and management of Marsabit National Reserve, Kenya, Journal of Human Ecology, 30(1), 55–62.
  20. Shoo R. A. and Songorwa A. N. (2013), Contribution of ecotourism to nature conservation and improvement of livelihoods around Amani nature reserve, Tanzania, Journal of Ecotourism, 12(2), 75–89.
  21. Snyman, S. (2014), The impact of ecotourism employment on rural household incomes and social welfare in six southern African countries, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 14(1–2), 37–52.
  22. Stem, C., Lassoie, J., Lee, D. and Deshler, D. (2003), How "eco" is ecotourism? A comparative case study of ecotourism in Costa Rica, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(4), 322–347.
  23. Tessema, M. E., Ahsenafi, Z. T., Lilieholm, R. J. & Leader-Williams, N. (2007), Community attitudes to wildlife conservation in Ethiopia. In S. Weber and D. Harmon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 George Wright Society Conference “Protected areas in a changing world”, 287–292, Hancock, MI: The George Wright Society.