Land suitability for land use type of orange planting in Nam Dong district, Thua Thien Hue province
PDF (Vietnamese)

Keywords

orange cultivation
land evaluation
land use type
Nam Dong đất trồng cam
đánh giá đất đai
loại hình sử dụng đất
Nam Đông

Abstract

Secondary data collected from relevant agencies in the study area and primary data from soil sampling and interviewing experts and professional staff were used in a multi-criteria assessment model using the Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process method. Based on overlapping 12 maps featuring the natural, economic and social factors, we identified 119 land units for orange cultivation. The results show that the natural factor is the most significant (with a weight of 0.674), followed by the economic factor (0.212) and the social factor (0.114). These findings indicate that improving soil quality is necessary to raise the land suitability for orange cultivation. Among land suitability for orange trees, 1,756.11 ha is considered to be suitable for S2 (12.25% of the total agricultural land); 2,714.62 ha is less suitable for S3 (19.80%), and 9,857.22 ha is unsuitable for N (68.85%). The Fuzzy-AHP is an effective method for multi-criteria land evaluation with the participation of various stakeholders.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijard.v131i3D.6738
PDF (Vietnamese)

References

  1. Ronja Herberg, Tung Gia Pham, Martin Kappas, Daniel Wyss, Chau Thi Minh Tran (2019), Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for the Land Evaluation of Potential Agricultural Land Use Types in a Hilly Area of Central Vietnam, Land, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/land8060090.
  2. Huỳnh Văn Chương (2011), Giáo trình Đánh giá đất, Nxb. Nông nghiệp Hồ Chí Minh.
  3. Nguyen, H. H. (2017), Evaluation of Coastal Sandy Land in Thanh Hoa province for Agricultural Development with Case study of Quang Xuong district, Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Greifswald, Germany.
  4. Malay Kumar Pramanik (2016), Site suitability analysis for agricultural land use of Darjeeling district using AHP and GIS techniques, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 2(56). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-016-0116-8.
  5. Mochammad Sobandi Dwi Putra, Septi Andryana, Fauziah, Aris Gunaryati (2018), Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Determine the Quality of Gemstones, Advances in Fuzzy Systems, Article ID 9094380. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9094380.
  6. Saeid Hamzeh, Marzieh Mokarram, Seyed Kazem Alavipanah (2014), Combination of Fuzzy and AHP methods to assess land suitability for barley: Case Study of semi arid lands in the southwest of Iran, Desert, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.22059/JDESERT.2014.52346.
  7. Behnam Tashayo, Afshin Honarbakhsh, Aliasghar Azma, Mohammad Akbari (2020), Combined Fuzzy AHP–GIS for Agricultural Land Suitability Modeling for a Watershed in Southern Iran, Environmental Management, 66, 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01310-8.
  8. UBND huyện Nam Đông (2020), Niên giám thống kê huyện Nam Đông năm 2020.
  9. UBND huyện Nam Đông (2020), Báo cáo kinh tế - xã hội huyện Nam Đông năm 2020.
  10. Tung Gia Pham, Hung Trong Nguyen, Martin Kappas (2018), Assessment of soil quality indicators under different agricultural land uses and topographic aspects in Central Vietnam. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2018.08.001.
  11. Bộ Khoa học và công nghệ, Tiêu chuẩn quốc gia TCVN 5979:2007 về Chất lượng đất- xác định pH.
  12. Viện Nông hoá thổ nhưỡng (2012), Tiêu chuẩn quốc gia TCVN 9294:2012 về Phân bón - Xác định Cacbon tổng số bằng phương pháp Walkley–Black.
  13. Saeid Hamzeh, Marzieh Mokarram, Seyed Kazem Alavipanah (2014), Combination of Fuzzy and AHP methods to assess land suitability for barley: Case Study of semi arid lands in the southwest of Iran, 19(2) - Serial Number 2, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.22059/JDESERT.2014.52346.
  14. Fahrul Agus, Rahmat Sholeh, Li Za (2014), Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Land Suitability Analysis Compared to Analytical Hierarchy Process, Conference: IcosTechs 2014 At: Batam, Indonesia Volume: 1.
  15. Xin Zhang, Peide Liu (2010), Method for aggregating triangular fuzzy intuitionistic fuzzy information and its application to decision making, Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 16(2), 280–290. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.18.
  16. Mochammad Sobandi Dwi Putra , Septi Andryana , Fauziah and Aris Gunaryati (2018), Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process Method to Determine the Quality of Gemstones, Advances in Fuzzy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9094380.
  17. Yan Liu, Claudia M. Eckert, ChristopherEarl (2020), A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements, Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 15 December 2020, 113738, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738.
  18. Nguyễn Văn Lợi, Lê Thị Khánh Tâm (2019), Áp dụng mô hình không gian dựa trên cơ sở GIS để xác định vùng phân bố tự nhiên các loài mây thương mại ở xã Tà Pơơ; huyện Nam Giang, tỉnh Quảng Nam, Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ nông nghiệp, 4(3), 2085–2094.
  19. Nguyen Tien Long, Michael Böhme (2010), Building Geoprocessing Models for Land Suitability Assessment for “Thanh Tra” Pomelo in Central-Vietnam, Tropentag, October 5–7, 2011 in Bonn.