THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL TRUST IN THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL REPUTATION AND EMPLOYEE GREEN BEHAVIOR IN THE TOURISM INDUSTRY
PDF (Vietnamese)

Keywords

Organizational reputation; Organizational trust; Employee green behavior. Danh tiếng tổ chức; Niềm tin tổ chức; Hành vi xanh của nhân viên.

Abstract

This study examines the mediating role of organizational trust in the relationship between organizational reputation and employee green behavior within tourism enterprises located in Xuan Huong Ward, Da Lat City, Lam Dong Province. The research emphasizes the internal psychological mechanisms through which organizational reputation is translated into environmentally responsible employee behavior. Data were collected from 367 valid surveys. The empirical results indicate that organizational reputation exerts a significant direct effect on employee green behavior and an indirect effect through organizational trust, confirming a partial mediation mechanism. In addition, servant-oriented leadership plays a moderating role by strengthening the impact of organizational reputation on organizational trust. The proposed model demonstrates substantial explanatory and predictive power, highlighting the importance of trust-building and leadership practices in fostering sustainable employee behavior in the tourism sector.
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v135i5A.8171
PDF (Vietnamese)

References

  1. Báo Lâm Đồng. (2025). Đà Lạt đón hơn 10 triệu lượt khách năm 2024. Sở Văn hóa, Thể thao và Du lịch tỉnh Lâm Đồng. Lâm Đồng chào đón du khách thứ 10 triệu trong năm 2024
  2. Báo Lao động. (2025). Ô nhiễm nghiêm trọng ở hồ Xuân Hương ở Đà Lạt
  3. S. Agarwal, V. Dagar, and R. Maheshwari, “Corporate reputation and employee green behavior: Empirical evidence from service organizations,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4470, 2018, doi: 10.3390/su10124470.
  4. K. De Roeck and O. Farooq, “Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Investigating their interactive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 151, no. 4, pp. 923–939, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10551-017-3656-6.
  5. S. Helm, “A matter of reputation and pride: Associations between corporate social responsibility and employer attractiveness,” Zeitschrift für Personalforschung, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 343–360, 2013, doi: 10.1177/239700221302700404.
  6. S. Y. Kim, “The role of organizational reputation in employee green behavior: The mediating effect of perceived organizational support,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1056–1067, 2022, doi: 10.1002/csr.2222.
  7. R. C. Mayer, J. H. Davis, and F. D. Schoorman, “An integrative model of organizational trust,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709–734, 1995, doi: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
  8. O. Farooq, M. Farooq, and S. M. Jasimuddin, “Employees’ response to corporate social responsibility: Exploring the role of employees’ collectivist orientation,” European Management Journal, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 916–927, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2014.03.002.
  9. F. X. Yang, V. M. C. Lau, and R. Law, “Green human resource management and green employee behavior: A systematic literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 7198, 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14127198.
  10. H. M. Nguyen and L. V. Ngo, “Trust and knowledge sharing in Vietnamese enterprises: The role of transformational leadership and organizational justice,” Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 233–256, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10490-018-9635-5.
  11. D. M. Rousseau, S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C. Camerer, “Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 393–404, 1998, doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.926617.
  12. L. Su and S. R. Swanson, “The effect of CSR initiatives on tourists’ green behavior: Evidence from a developing country,” Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, vol. 39, pp. 1–10, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.02.004.
  13. Q. H. Tran and T. N. Nguyen, “Corporate social responsibility and employee green behavior in Vietnam’s hospitality sector: The mediating role of organizational commitment,” Journal of Sustainable Tourism, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 1620–1639, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09669582.2020.1720690.
  14. H. Huffman and S. R. Klein, “Green behavior in the workplace: The influence of green self-identity, green climate perceptions, and green organizational identity,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 153–175, 2013, doi: 10.1002/job.1826.
  15. R. Chaudhary, “Green human resource management and employee green behavior: An empirical analysis,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 630–641, 2020, doi: 10.1002/csr.1827.
  16. J. Dumont, J. Shen, and X. Deng, “Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values,” Human Resource Management, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 613–627, 2017, doi: 10.1002/hrm.21792.
  17. M. Darvishmotevali and L. Altinay, “Green human resource management, green organizational identity and employee green behavior: Evidence from the hotel industry,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 102, p. 103154, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103154.
  18. Y.-K. Lee, Y. Kim, K.-H. Lee, and D.-X. Li, “The impact of CSR on relationship quality and relationship outcomes: A perspective of service employees,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 745–756, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.011.
  19. M. Gotsi and A. M. Wilson, “Corporate reputation: Seeking a definition,” Corporate Communications: An International Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–30, 2001, doi: 10.1108/13563280110381189.
  20. B. E. Ashforth and F. Mael, “Social identity theory and the organization,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 20–39, 1989, doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4278999.
  21. D. Lange, P. M. Lee, and Y. Dai, “Organizational reputation: A review,” Journal of Management, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 153–184, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0149206310390963.
  22. C. Merlin and J. Chen, “Green human resource management and organizational attractiveness: The mediating role of corporate reputation,” International Journal of Hospitality Management, vol. 103, p. 103198, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103198.
  23. G. Yukl, Leadership in Organizations, 8th ed. Pearson, 2013.
  24. P. G. Northouse, Leadership: Theory and Practice, 8th ed. Sage, 2021.
  25. R. C. Liden, S. J. Wayne, C. Liao, and J. D. Meuser, “Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 1434–1452, 2014.
  26. J. Cohen, “A power primer,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 155–159, 1992, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
  27. D. Goodhue, W. Lewis, and R. Thompson, “Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data?” MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 981–1001, 2012.
  28. N. Kock, “Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach,” International Journal of e-Collaboration, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2015, doi: 10.4018/ijec.2015100101.
  29. P. Paxton, “Social capital and democracy in contemporary societies,” American Sociological Review, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 254–277, 2001.
  30. J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 139–152, 2011, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
  31. Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107. doi: 10.1093/biomet/61.1.101
  32. Stone, M. (1974). Cross validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 36(2), 111 to 133. DOI: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.
  33. J. F. Hair, G. T. M. Hult, C. M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd ed. Sage, 2017.
  34. J. Zhang, J. Cui, X. Chai, and S. Li, “Configuring green behaviors in hospitality: A drive–state–pressure model analysis of institutional and individual dynamics,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 16, p. 1609809, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1609809.
  35. M. J. Bissing-Olson, A. Iyer, K. S. Fielding, and H. Zacher, “Relationships between daily affect and pro-environmental behavior at work: The moderating role of pro-environmental attitude,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 156–175, 2013, doi: 10.1002/job.1788.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Array