Confirming correctness of procedure for determining soft parameters in Coulomb potential of noble atoms
Vol. 133 No. 1D (2024), Original Article
Vol. 133 No. 1D (2024)

Confirming correctness of procedure for determining soft parameters in Coulomb potential of noble atoms

Original Article
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijns.v133i1D.7451
Published 2024-12-31
Thu D. H. Truong*
Department of Physics, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Bach N. X. Ho
Department of Physics, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Tai V. Do
Department of Physics, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
PDF

Keywords

English the soft parameter
the Coulomb potential
nonsequential double ionization
classical model

How to Cite

1.
Truong TDH, Ho BNX, Do TV. Confirming correctness of procedure for determining soft parameters in Coulomb potential of noble atoms. hueuni-jns [Internet]. 2024Dec.31 [cited 2025Mar.18];133(1D):63-70. Available from: https://jos.hueuni.edu.vn/index.php/hujos-ns/article/view/7451
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

This paper verifies that the procedure described in [Computer Physics Communications, 276, 108372 (2022)] for determining the soft parameters in the Coulomb potential of noble atoms is accurate via the modification of the initial position value of x0 and the parameter b range. In the case of nonsequential double ionization (NSDI), the results demonstrate that the value of x0 is not contingent upon the range of computed parameter a. Furthermore, we examine the significance of parameter b in the NSDI process and conclude that the ideal value for the soft Coulomb parameter of b is that b ≤ 0.1 a.u.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijns.v133i1D.7451
PDF

References

  1. Rudenko A, de Jesus VLB., Ergler Th, Zrost K, Feuerstein B, Schröter CD, et al. Correlated two-electron momentum spectra for strong-field nonsequential double ionization of He at 800 nm. Physical Review Letters. 2007;99:263003.
  2. Hao X, Li W, Liu J, Chen J. Effect of the electron initial longitudinal velocity on the nonsequential double-ionization process. Physical Review A. 2011;83:053422.
  3. Bergues B, Kübel M, Johnson NG, Fischer B, Camus N, Betsch KJ, et al. Attosecond tracing of correlated electron-emission in non-sequential double ionization. Nature Communications. 2012;3:813.
  4. Emmanouilidou A, Meltzer T. Recollision as a probe of magnetic field effects in non-sequential double ionization. Physical Review A. 2017;95:033405.
  5. Sun F, Chen X, Zhang W, Qiang J, Li H, Lu P, et al. Longitudinal photon-momentum transfer in strong-field double ionization of argon atoms. Physical Review A. 2020;101:021402.
  6. Chen Z, Zhou A, Morishita T, Bai Y, Hao X, Zatsarinny O, et al. Anticorrelation in nonsequential double ionization of helium. Physical Review A. 2021; 103:053102.
  7. Hao X, Bai Y, Li C, Zhang J, Li W, Yang W, et al. Recollision of excited electron in below-threshold nonsequential double ionization. Communications Physics. 2022;5:31.
  8. Truong TDH, Tran DAT, Nguyen HH, Nguyen HN, Do HD, Pham NTV. Intensity dependence of the Coulomb-repulsion effect in strong-field nonsequential double ionization. Acta Physica Polonica A. 2022;141:569-577.
  9. Suran VV, Zapesochnyi IP. Observation of Sr2+ in multiple-photon ionization of strontium. Soviet Technical Physics Letters. 1975;1:2.
  10. Corkum PB. Plasma perspective on strong field multiphoton ionization. Physical Review Letters. 1993;71:1994-7.
  11. Ammosov M. V, Delone NB, Krainov VP. Tunnel ionization of complex atoms and of atomic ions in an alternating electromagnetic field. Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics. 1986;64:1191.
  12. Panfili R, Eberly JH, Haan SL. Comparing classical and quantum dynamics of strong-field double ionization. Optics Express. 2001;8:431-435.
  13. Haan SL, Breen L, Karim A, Eberly JH. Variable time lag and backward ejection in full-dimensional analysis of strong-field double ionization. Physical Review Letters. 2006;97:103008.
  14. Zhou Y, Liao Q, Lu P. Asymmetric electron energy sharing in strong-field double ionization of helium. Physical Review A. 2010;82:053402.
  15. Pham VNT, Tostikhin Oleg I, Morishita T. Molecular Siegert states in an electric field. II. Transverse momentum distribution of the ionized electrons. Physical Review A. 2014;89:033426-12.
  16. Truong TDH, Nguyen HH, Le HB, Do HD, Tran HM, Nguyen DV, et al. Soft parameters in Coulomb potential of noble atoms for nonsequential double ionization: Classical ensemble model and simulations. Computer Physics Communications. 2022;276:108372.
  17. Wang X. Theory of strong-field atomic ionization for elliptical or circular polarization [Ph.D. Thesis]. Rochester: University of Rochester; 2013.
  18. Benhai Y, Yingbin L. Non-sequential double ionization of argon by elliptically polarized laser pulses. Journal of Modern Optics. 2012;59:1797-1802.
  19. Chen Y, Zhou Y, Li Y, Li M, Lan P, Lu P. The contribution of the delayed ionization in strong-field nonsequential double ionization. Journal of Chemical Physics. 2016;144:024304.
  20. Li YB, Wang X, Yu BH, Tang QB, Wang GH, Wan JG. Nonsequential double ionization with mid-infrared laser fields. Science Reports. 2016;6:37413.
  21. Sarkadi L. Laser-induced nonsequential double ionization of helium: Classical model calculations. Journal of Physics B. 2020;53:165401.
  22. Eremina E, Liu X, Rottke H, Sandner W, Dreischuh A, Lindner F, et al. Laser-induced non-sequential double ionization investigated at and below the threshold for electron impact ionization. Journal of Physics B. 2003;36:3269.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Array