Policy and governance of the digital economy in Southeast Asia: a mixed-methods analysis combining bibliometric and systematic reviews
Vol. 134 No. 5C (2025), Original Article
Vol. 134 No. 5C (2025)

Policy and governance of the digital economy in Southeast Asia: a mixed-methods analysis combining bibliometric and systematic reviews

Original Article
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v134i5C.7984
Published 2025-10-01
Duong Thi Hai Phuong
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam
Ho Quoc Dung
School of Engineering and Technology - Hue University, 01 Dien Bien Phu St., Hue, Vietnam
PDF (Vietnamese)

Keywords

chính sách kinh tế số
Đông Nam Á
phương pháp hỗn hợp
quản trị kinh tế số
tổng quan hệ thống
trắc lượng thư mục digital economy policy
Southeast Asia
mixed-methods
digital economy governance
systematic review
bibliometrics

Abstract

This paper aims to address the fragmentation in digital economy policy research by employing a mixed-methods approach, combining bibliometric analysis and a systematic review of 483 documents from Scopus in Southeast Asia. The bibliometric analysis reveals a surge in scientific publications during the 2021–2024 period, with key themes centered on digital transformation, support for small and medium-sized enterprises, and the governance of new technologies. Building on this, the systematic review highlighted key policy debates: the need to balance foundational legal frameworks with tailored policies, the indirect role of government in fostering an innovative environment, and the challenge of striking a balance between promoting new technologies and managing risks. By integrating quantitative breadth with qualitative depth, the study provides a robust evidence base, enabling policymakers and the scientific community to identify trends and research gaps with greater clarity.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v134i5C.7984
PDF (Vietnamese)

References

  1. F. Hoppe, A. Baijal, W. Chang, S. Chadna and F. W. Hoong, “e-Conomy SEA 2023,” Bain. Accessed: July 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.bain.com/insights/e-conomy-sea-2023/
  2. O. OCDE (2020), Digital Economy Outlook 2020, Paris, Francia, OECD Publishing.
  3. A. A. Oloyede, N. Faruk, N. Noma, E. Tebepah, and A. K. Nwaulune (2023), Measuring the impact of the digital economy in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis,Heliyon, 9, 7, Accessed: July 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.cell.com/heliyon/fulltext/S2405-8440(23)04862-4
  4. S. O. Putri, A. S. Yahya, A. Attahira, L. S. Nabilasari, and V. Tamaela (2023), Digital economy growth in Singapore and Thailand following the post-COVID-19 pandemic, Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 10, 4, 557–568.
  5. G. Myovella, M. Karacuka, and J. Haucap (2020), Digitalization and economic growth: A comparative analysis of Sub-Saharan Africa and OECD economies, Telecommunications policy, 44, 2, 101856.
  6. H. S. Kehal and V. P. Singh (2025), Digital Economy: impacts, influences, and challenges. IGI Global. Accessed: June 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books?hl=vi&lr=&id=Vs-i2DeudL0C&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Digital+economy+policies+and+their+impact+on+global+markets:+A+systematic+review&ots=Flcs_jaOIO&sig=R3_nqMZv4KOe-inG4OgpsRv0jH4
  7. I. Ivanova and D. Sceulovs (2018), Identifying elements of the digital economy ecosystem, Journal of Business Management, 16, Accessed: June 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://journals.riseba.eu/index.php/jbm/article/view/38
  8. D. Kisel’áková, M. Košíková, M. Miškufová, and V. Loumová (2024), “Driving factors of the digital economy-how countries can manage their digital development,” Polish Journal of Management Studies, 29, Accessed: June 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://yadda.icm.edu.pl/baztech/element/bwmeta1.element.baztech-900e1e54-1f61-4e44-8a23-513f48c49fa0
  9. S. Wang, X. Sun, and S. Zhong (2023), Exploring the multiple paths to improve the construction level of digital government: Qualitative comparative analysis based on the WSR framework, Sustainability, 15, 13, 9891.
  10. P. Keller and A. Tarkowski, “Digital Public Space–A missing policy frame for shaping Europe’s digital future,” Open Future, 2021, Accessed: June 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://openfuture.pubpub.org/pub/digital-public-space-policy-frame/release/1
  11. C. Kuner (2020), The GDPR and international organizations, 2020, Accessed: June 08, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-journal-of-international-law/article/gdpr-and-international-organizations/5EDB2AA87AB6BAF9C3731FF3CD0080A9
  12. T. Homa (2024), “Taxation of digital economy according to OECD,” INTERACTION OF LAW AND ECONOMICS: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 76.
  13. G. Liva, C. Codagnone, G. Misuraca, V. Gineikyte, and E. Barcevicius (2020), Exploring digital government transformation: a literature review, in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, Athens Greece, ACM, 502–509. doi: 10.1145/3428502.3428578.
  14. UN E-Government Survey 2022, Accessed: July 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022
  15. A. Kopylchak (2023), OECD/G20 Pillar One Proposal to Address Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation of Economy,” PhD Thesis, Mykolo Romerio universitetas, Accessed: June 08, 2025,. [Online]. Available: https://gs.elaba.lt/object/elaba:152451725/
  16. Tax Challenges Arising from Digitalisation of the Economy – Global Anti-Base Erosion Model Rules (Pillar Two), OECD, Accessed: July 23, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/tax-challenges-arising-from-digitalisation-of-the-economy-global-anti-base-erosion-model-rules-pillar-two_782bac33-en.html
  17. N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. M. Lim (2021), How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines, Journal of business research, 133, 285–296.
  18. N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman (2014), Visualizing Bibliometric Networks, Measuring Scholarly Impact, Y. Ding, R. Rousseau, and D. Wolfram, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 285–320, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_13.
  19. A. Barata (2019), Strengthening national economic growth and equitable income through sharia digital economy in Indonesia, Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 5, 1, 145–168.
  20. M. Jehangir, P. D. D. Dominic, and A. Khan (2011), Towards digital economy: the development of ICT and e-commerce in Malaysia, Modern Applied Science, 5, 2, 171.
  21. A. S. Sudarwanto and D. B. B. Kharisma (2022), Comparative study of personal data protection regulations in Indonesia, Hong Kong and Malaysia, Journal of Financial Crime, 29, 04, 1443–1457.
  22. R. Wirdiyanti et al. (2023), How does e-commerce adoption impact micro, small, and medium enterprises’ performance and financial inclusion? Evidence from Indonesia, Electron Commer Res, 23, 04, 2485–2515, doi: 10.1007/s10660-022-09547-7.
  23. B. Trianto, N. H. Nik Azman, and M. Masrizal (2025), E-payment adoption and utilization among micro-entrepreneurs: a comparative analysis between Indonesia and Malaysia, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16, 02, 314–343.
  24. M. Najib and F. Fahma (2020), Investigating the adoption of digital payment system through an extended technology acceptance model: An insight from the Indonesian small and medium enterprises, International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 10, 4, 1702–1708.
  25. R. Sarif, R. M. Susanto, N. R. Retnasih, and S. Segaf (2023), Revolutionizing resilience: msmes’ journey with digital strategies in post-pandemic recovery, JMK (Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan), 08, 03, 203–218.
  26. B. T. Mai, P. V. Nguyen, U. N. H. Ton, and Z. U. Ahmed (2024), Government policy, IT capabilities, digital transformation, and innovativeness in Post-Covid context: case of Vietnamese SMEs, International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32, 02, 333–356.
  27. M. Alfarizi, T. Widiastuti, and Ngatindriatun (2024), Exploration of Technological Challenges and Public Economic Trends Phenomenon in the Sustainable Performance of Indonesian Digital MSMEs on Industrial Era 4.0, J. Ind. Intg. Mgmt., 09, 01, 65–96, doi: 10.1142/S2424862223500045.
  28. V. A. Ta and C.-Y. Lin (2023), Exploring the determinants of digital transformation adoption for SMEs in an emerging economy, Sustainability, 15, 9, 7093.
  29. P. J. Morgan (2022), Fintech and Financial Inclusion in Southeast Asia and India, Asian Economic Policy Review, 17, 2, 183–208, doi: 10.1111/aepr.12379.
  30. A. S. Sudarwanto and D. B. B. Kharisma (2022), Comparative study of personal data protection regulations in Indonesia, Hong Kong and Malaysia, Journal of Financial Crime, 29, 4, 1443–1457.
  31. M. Khalfan, N. Azizi, O. Haass, T. Maqsood, and I. Ahmed (2022), Blockchain technology: Potential applications for public sector E-procurement and project management, Sustainability, 14, 10, 5791.
  32. R. P. Wadipalapa et al. (2024), An Ambitious Artificial Intelligence Policy in a Decentralised Governance System: Evidence From Indonesia, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 43, 1, 65–93, doi: 10.1177/18681034231226393.
  33. A. I. Abueid et al (2025), Digital Finance and Fintech Innovations Towards Disrupting Finance Innovation, Artificial Intelligence, Sustainable Technologies, and Business Innovation: Opportunities and Challenges of Digital Transformation, 1171, A. Al-Sartawi and H. Ghura, Eds., in Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 1171. , Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 17–31, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-77925-1_2.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Array