EXPLORING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ENVIRONMENTAL TAXATION AND ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY IN VIETNAM: AN ARDL ANALYSIS
PDF

Keywords

English Environmental taxation
Green growth
Energy productivity
Renewable energy
ARDL model
Vietnam

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of environmental taxation on green growth in Vietnam over the period 2010–2022, situated within the broader context of sustainable development and energy transition. Utilizing annual time-series data, the study employs the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model and its associated Error Correction Model (ECM) to examine both short-run dynamics and long-run relationships. Empirical results reveal that economic growth and renewable energy consumption are positively associated with energy productivity, particularly regarding the long-run coefficients. Renewable energy exhibits a relatively stable and positive relationship, highlighting its vital role in improving energy efficiency and supporting the transition toward a low-carbon economy. While environmental taxation is not statistically significant in the short run, it shows a positive long-run association. While the error correction term is negative and statistically significant, the Bounds test provides only limited evidence of cointegration, likely due to the small sample size. The findings suggest that environmental taxes have possible associations in the Vietnam context over the sample period. The study provides policy-relevant insights for improving environmental tax design and promoting sustainable growth strategies in emerging economies.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v135i5S-1.8372
PDF

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/
  2. International Energy Agency. (2023). World Energy Outlook 2023. Retrieved from https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023
  3. World Bank. (2012). Inclusive Green Growth: The Pathway to Sustainable Development. World Bank.
  4. Integrated Carbon Observation System. (2023). Global Carbon Project. Retrieved from https://meta.icos-cp.eu/objects/_9U_AMxuaV1EtI58ZJlOguF9
  5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Policy Instruments for the Environment (PINE) Database. Retrieved from https://oecd-main.shinyapps.io/pinedatabase/
  6. Arthur Cecil Pigou. (1920). The Economics of Welfare. London: Macmillan. Retrieved from https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/pigou-the-economics-of-welfare
  7. Bosquet, B. (2000). Environmental tax reform: Does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 19–32.
  8. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). OECD Regional Outlook 2011. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-regional-outlook-2011_9789264120983-en.html
  9. Arogundade, S., & Hassan, A. S. (2024). The path to green economy: Do environmental taxes and renewable energy transition matter in OECD countries? Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 5.
  10. Nchofoung, T. N., Fotio, H. K., & Miamo, C. W. (2023). Green taxation and renewable energy technologies adoption: A global evidence. Renewable Energy Focus, 44, 334–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.01.010
  11. Sun, Y., Belgacem, S. B., Khatoon, G., & Nazir, F. (2025). Impact of environmental taxation, green innovation, economic growth, and renewable energy on green total factor productivity. Renewable Energy Focus, 218–227.
  12. Hieu, V. M. (2022). Influence of green investment, environmental tax and sustainable environment: Evidence from ASEAN countries. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13028
  13. D. Romero Jordan., Pablo, D. Río., Pinto. F (2025). Does energy productivity boost total factor productivity?, Energy Policy, 206 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114766
  14. Hoa, D. T., Kim Anh, V. T., Duyen, L. P., Van, P. T., & Chau, H. T. (2020). Impact of environmental tax collection on CO₂ emission in Vietnam. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10153
  15. Hung, N. T., Huynh Anh, N. T., Phuong Thao, L. T., Tien Dat, P. H., Tran, P. T., & Phat, N. C. (2025). Analysis of the impact of environmental taxes, renewable energy, green finance, trade openness, and structural changes on CO₂ emissions in Vietnam.
  16. Nhung, N. T., & Minh, L. B. (2018). CO₂ emissions and economic growth in Vietnam: An ARDL bound testing approach. Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, 6(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.8.2018.61.47.55
  17. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Array