FORMAL CREDIT, RURAL HOUSEHOLD LIVING STANDARDS: A STUDY OF THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION OF VIETNAM
Tập 133 Số 5C (2024), Nghiên cứu
Tập 133 Số 5C (2024)

FORMAL CREDIT, RURAL HOUSEHOLD LIVING STANDARDS: A STUDY OF THE NORTH CENTRAL REGION OF VIETNAM

Nghiên cứu
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v133i5C.7620
Đã xuất bản 2024-09-30
Le Viet Giap
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Khanh Trang
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam
Pham Quoc Khang
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam
Nguyen The Hung
University of Economics, Hue University, 99 Ho Dac Di St., Hue, Vietnam
PDF (English)

Từ khóa

Tín dụng chính thức
Tín dụng nông thôn
So sánh khớp nối điểm xu hướng formal credit
rural credit
propensity score matching

Tóm tắt

This study focuses on evaluating the impact of access to formal credit on the living standards of rural households in the North Central region of Vietnam. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used on the Vietnam Household Living Standards Survey (VHLSS) 2020 database to examine this impact. The research results indicate that participation in formal credit has the potential to improve the living standards of households in the rural area of the North Central region. The improvement is approximately 2 percent of per capita income. In addition, this study also shows that formal credit can have a positive impact on poverty reduction. Specifically, participation in formal credit reduces poverty rates in rural areas of North Central Vietnam, although the reduction in these poverty rates is still modest.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v133i5C.7620
PDF (English)

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Barslund, M., & Tarp, F. (2008), Formal and Informal Rural Credit in Four Provinces of Vietnam, The Journal of Development Studies, 44(4), 485–503. doi:10.1080/00220380801980.
  2. Government Portal (2024), Announcing national and regional multidimensional poverty rates in 2023, extracted from https://xaydungchinhsach.chinhphu.vn/cong-bo-ty-le-ngheo-da-chieu-toan-quoc-va-theo-cac-vung-nam-2023 on 25th February 2024.
  3. Morduch, Jonathan J., Cull, Robert J. (2017), Microfinance and economic development (English), Policy Research working paper, no. WPS 8252 Washington, D.C.: World BankGroup. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/107171511360386561/Microfinance-and-economic-development.
  4. Li, X., Gan, C., Hu, B. (2011), The welfare impact of microcredit on rural households in China, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(4), 404–411.
  5. Santana Félix & Belo, T. F. (2019), The impact of microcredit on poverty reduction in eleven developing countries in south-east Asia, Journal of Multinational Financial Management Volumes, 52–53.
  6. Islam, A. J. J. O. A. E. (2015), Heterogeneous effects of microcredit: Evidence from large-scale programs in Bangladesh, Journal of Asian Economics 37, 48–58.
  7. Schroeder, E. (2020), The impact of microcredit borrowing on household consumption in Bangladesh, Applied Economics, 1–15. doi:10.1080/00036846.2020.
  8. Mckernan, S. M. (2002), The impact of microcredit programs on Non-credit Program Aspects matter, Review of Economics and Statistics, 93–115.
  9. You, J. (2012), The role of microcredit in older children’s nutrition: Quasi-experimental evidence from rural China, Food Policy, 43, 167–179.
  10. Michel, S. & Randriamanampisoa H. (2017), The capability approach as a framework for assessing the role of microcredit in resource conversion: the case of rural households in the Madagascar highlands, Oxford Development Studies.
  11. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011), Poor Economics: A Radical Rethinking of the Way to Fight Global Poverty, Public Affairs.
  12. Khandker, S. R., & Samad, H. A. (2014), Dynamic effects of microcredit in Bangladesh, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper (6821).
  13. Zeller, M., & Sharma, M. (1998), Rural Finance and Poverty Alleviation, IFPRI Policy Briefs.
  14. Morduch, J. (1998), Does Microfinance Really Help the Poor? New Evidence from Flagship, Programs in Bangladesh, Financial Access Initiative.
  15. Eriksen, S., & Lensink, R. (2015), Measuring the impact of an ongoing microcredit project: evidence from a study in Ghana, Journal of Development Effectiveness, 1–11. doi:10.1080/19439342.2015.1095.
  16. Brett, J. A. (2006), We Sacrifice and Eat Less: The Structural Complexities of Microfinance Participation, Human Organization, 65(1), 8–19.
  17. Rahman, A. (1999), Women and Microcredit in Rural Bangladesh: An Anthropological Study of Grameen Bank Lending, Westview Press.
  18. Nguyen, V. C. (2008), Is a Governmental Microcredit Program for the Poor really Pro¬poor? Evidence from Vietnam, The Developing Economies, 46(2), 151–187.
  19. Dang T. H. Y., Nanseki T., & Chomei Y. (2017), The Impact of Microfinance on Household Welfare in Rural Vietnam: A Case Study in Phu Tho Province, Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Kyushu University.
  20. Nguyen, L. T., Hoai Nguyen, A. P., van Passel, S., Azadi, H., & Lebailly, P. (2018), Access to Preferential Loans for Poverty Reduction and Rural Development: Evidence from Vietnam, Journal of Economic Issues, 52(1), 246–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1430953.
  21. Thanh, P. T., Saito, K., & Duong, P. B. (2019), Impact of microcredit on rural household welfare and economic growth in Vietnam, Journal of Policy Modeling, 41(1), 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.02.007.
  22. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983), The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects, Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
  23. Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2005), Some Practical Guidance for the Implementation of Propensity Score Matching, DIW Discussion Paper, 485.
  24. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984), A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761–766.
  25. Deheja, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002), Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.
  26. Rehman, W. U., Degirmen, S., & Waseem, F. (2021), Propensity for and quality of intellectual capital divulgence across the BRICS banking sector: A knowledge-based perspective from emerging econ- omies, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
  27. Bali Swain, Ranjula & Varghese, Adel (2010), Microfinance ‘Plus’: The Impact of Business Training on Indian Self Help Groups, Working Paper Series 2010:24, Uppsala University, Department of Economics.
  28. Khandker, S. R. (2005), Microfinance and Poverty: Evidence Using Panel Data from Bangladesh, World Bank Economic Review, 19(2), 263–286.
  29. Angelucci, M., Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2015), Microcredit Impacts: Evidence from a Randomized Microcredit Program Placement Experiment by Compartamos Banco, American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 7(1), 151–182.
  30. Attanasio, O., Augsburg, B., Haas, R. D., Fitzsimons, E., & Harmgart, H. (2011), Group lending or individual lending? Evidence from a randomised field experiment in Mongolia, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
Creative Commons License

công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Ghi công-Chia sẻ tương tự 4.0 License International .

Bản quyền (c) 2024 Array