MARKET POTENTIAL AND VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF WILD AND CULTIVATED GANODERMA LUCIDUM IN THE BUFFER ZONE OF KON KA KINH NATIONAL PARK, VIETNAM
Tập 135 Số 5S-1 (2026), Special Issue: SAST 2025
Tập 135 Số 5S-1 (2026)

MARKET POTENTIAL AND VALUE CHAIN ANALYSIS OF WILD AND CULTIVATED GANODERMA LUCIDUM IN THE BUFFER ZONE OF KON KA KINH NATIONAL PARK, VIETNAM

Special Issue: SAST 2025
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v135i5S-1.8076
Đã xuất bản 2026-04-23
Thi Thu Hue Ha
1School of Interdisciplinary Sciences and Arts, Vietnam National University, 144 Xuan Thuy, Dich Vong, Cau Giay, Hanoi, Vietnam
Sy Hung Uong
PRCF Vietnam

Tóm tắt

This study analyzes the market potential and value chain of Ganoderma lucidum (lingzhi) in the buffer zone of Kon Ka Kinh National Park, Gia Lai Province, Vietnam. Despite its high medicinal and economic value, commercialization remains limited by unsustainable wild harvesting, low value addition, and unequal benefit distribution among the Banah ethnic group. Using a mixed-methods approach combining household surveys (n = 187), interviews, and focus groups, we mapped the value chain, assessed socioeconomic and ecological dynamics, and conducted a SWOT analysis to evaluate the feasibility of under-canopy cultivation. Results reveal that wild lingzhi stocks declined by 40% from 2020 to 2024 due to overharvesting, while foragers capture less than 25% of final retail prices. SWOT findings indicate strong community interest (60% of households) and ecological suitability for cultivation under acacia canopies as key strengths, alongside weaknesses such as low technical knowledge, limited financial access, and water scarcity. Opportunities include partnerships with private processors, participation in the One Commune One Product (OCOP) program, and adoption of certification schemes (organic, FairWild) to enhance traceability and market value. However, ongoing ecological decline, drought, and gender inequalities pose significant threats. The study emphasizes the need for an integrated strategy linking cultivation, value addition, cooperative marketing, and gender-sensitive capacity building. By applying the Sustainable Value Chain (SVC) framework, this research provides evidence-based insights for inclusive and ecologically responsible commercialization of non-timber forest products in Vietnam’s upland buffer zones.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijed.v135i5S-1.8076
PDF (English)

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. Wasser, S. P. (2011), Current findings, future trends, and unsolved problems in studies of medicinal mushrooms, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 89(5):1323-1332. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-010-3067-4
  2. Bishop, K. S., Kao, C. H. J., Glucina, Y. X., Marcus, P. R., Paterson, R. M., & Ferguson, L R. (2015), From 2000 years of Ganoderma lucidum to recent developments in nutraceuticals, Phytochemistry, 114, 56–65. DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2015.02.015.
  3. Melissa, M., Carranza-Velázquez, J., Mata-Hidalgo, M., Amador-Fernández, X., & Urbina, H. (2023), Taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Ganoderma (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) in Costa Rica, MycoKeys 100: 5–47. DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.100.106810
  4. Li, S., Dong, C., Wen, H., & Liu, X. (2016), Development of Ling-zhi industry in China – emanated from the artificial cultivation in the Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMCAS), Mycology, 28;7(2):74–80. DOI: 10.1080/21501203.2016.1171805
  5. Hapuarachchi, K. K., Karunarathna, S. C., Raspé, O., De Silva, KHWL., Thawthong, A., Wu, XL., Kakumyan, P., Hyde, KD., & Wen, TC. (2018), High diversity of Ganoderma and Amauroderma (Ganodermataceae, Polyporales) in Hainan Island, China, Mycosphere, 9(5): 931–982 (2018). DOI 10.5943/mycosphere/9/5/1
  6. Yadav, M., & Dugaya, D. (2012), Non-timber forest products certification in India: Opportunities and challenges, Environment Development and Sustainability, 15(3):567-586. DOI:10.1007/s10668-012-9393-1
  7. Berch, S. M.., Kang-Hyeon, K., Hyun, P., & Winder, R. (2007), Development and potential of the cultivated and wild-harvested mushroom industries in the Republic of Korea and British Columbia, Journal of Ecosystems and Management. DOI:10.22230/jem.2007v8n3a372
  8. FAO (2017), Non-wood forest products in international statistical systems. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/expertgroup/egm2017/ac340-Bk3.PDF
  9. Shackleton, C. M., Adeyemi, O., & Setty, S. (2024), Why are non-wood forest products still the poor relative in Global Forest Resources Assessments?, Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 163, June 2024, 103232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103232
  10. Kaplinsky, R., & Morris, M. (2001), A Handbook for Value Chain Research, Ottawa: International Development Research Centre (IDRC).
  11. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005), The governance of global value chains, Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290500049805
  12. Ros-Tonen, M. A. F., Reed, J., & Sunderland, T. (2015), From synergy to complexity: The trend toward integrated value chain and landscape governance, Environmental Management, 62(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-018-1055-0
  13. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018), Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  14. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015), Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  15. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015), InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  16. Phillips, O. L., & Gentry, A. H. (1993), The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique, Economic Botany, 47(1), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02862203
  17. Sorrenti, S. (2017), Non-wood forest products in international statistical systems (Non-wood Forest Products Series No. 22), FAO, Rome. Products Series no. 22. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/expertgroup/egm2017/ac340-Bk3.PDF
  18. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  19. Patricia Shanley, Alan Pierce, Sarah Laird, Dawn Robinson. (2008), Beyond timber: Certification and management of non-timber forest products, CIFOR. https://www.cifor-icraf.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BShanley0801.pdf
  20. Todd Sanderson (2025), Vietnam smallholder farmers: challenges and opportunities for a sustainable future, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. https://www.aciar.gov.au/project/sss-2024-108
  21. Belcher, B., Ruiz-Pérez, M., & Achdiawan, R. (2005), Global patterns and trends in the use and management of commercial NTFPs: Implications for livelihoods and conservation, World Development, 33(9), 1435–1452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.10.007
  22. Tieguhong, J. C., Ingram, V., Mala, W. A., Ndoye, O., & Grouwels, S. (2020), How governance impacts non-timber forest product value chains in Cameroon, Forest Policy and Economics, 113, 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102106
  23. Acheampong, E., Macgregor, C. J., Sloan, S., & Sayer, J. (2019), Deforestation is driven by agricultural expansion in Ghana’s forest reserves, Scientific African, 5, e00146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00146
  24. Ingram, V., van den Berg, J., & van Oorschot, M. (2019), Gender and forest, tree and agroforestry value chains: Evidence from Cameroon, International Forestry Review, 21(4), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554819827906799
  25. FAO (2022), The State of the World’s Forests 2022: Forest pathways for green recovery and building inclusive, resilient and sustainable economies, Rome: FAO.
  26. Liang, Y., Huang, Y., Ma, J., & Li, X. (2025), Understory cultivation of medicinal plants promotes sustainable forestry development, Agroforestry Systems, 99(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01141-8
  27. Kozak, R., Bull, G., & Smith, P. M. (2024), Advancing sustainable forest value chains: Policy frameworks and pathways, Forest Policy and Economics, 155, 103975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103975
  28. Shanley, P., Pierce, A., Laird, S., & Robinson, D. (2008), Beyond timber: Certification and management of non-timber forest products, Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).
  29. Carodenuto, S., & Dawson, N. M. (2023), Linking agricultural policy to sustainable rural livelihoods: Lessons from sub-Saharan Africa, Journal of Rural Studies, 99, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.10.012
  30. Rai, N., & Scarborough, H. (2021), Gendered participation and benefits in community forestry: Insights from Nepal, Forest Policy and Economics, 124, 102389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102389
  31. Roderick P. Neumann and Eric Hirsch. (2000), Chapter two: Socio-Political Aspects of NTFP Commercialisation, Center for International Forestry Research. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep02161.6.pdf
Creative Commons License

công trình này được cấp phép theo Creative Commons Ghi công-Chia sẻ tương tự 4.0 License International .

Bản quyền (c) 2025 Array