Morphological characteristics of Quasipaa delacouri tadpoles in Pu Mat National Park, Nghe An province
PDF (Vietnamese)

How to Cite

1.
Thoại Đỗ V, Trung CT, Thảo NT, Bình NV. Morphological characteristics of Quasipaa delacouri tadpoles in Pu Mat National Park, Nghe An province. hueuni-jns [Internet]. 2019Nov.11 [cited 2024Dec.22];128(1C):25-33. Available from: https://jos.hueuni.edu.vn/index.php/hujos-ns/article/view/5330

Abstract

An analysis of the 16S rRNA mitochondrial sequence from the tail muscle of the tadpole Quasipaa delacouri in Pu Mat National Park, Nghe An Province, found 100% similarity with the DNA sequence of the species on GenBank, thereby expanding the distribution of this species in central Vietnam. The tadpole Q. delacuori in Nghe An Province has an oval body and a total length at stage 25,ranging from 22.89 to 32.44 mm. The tadpole has a light greyish-yellow colour, and the upper part of the back is darker than the ventral surface. Q. delacuori tadpoles have 11 labial tooth rows located in the inside of the mouth with the labial tooth row formula (LTRF): III(5 + 5)/(1 + 1)II. The upper and lower jaws of the tadpole are inside the labial tooth rows. The labial teeth and jaws of the tadpole have serrated edges on the outside with the horns curving into the mouth. The floor and the roof of the buccal cavity of the tadpole have many papillae with different lengths, and some papillae in the mouth have the shape of roots.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jns.v128i1C.5330
PDF (Vietnamese)

References

  1. Dubois A. Notes sur la classification des Ranidae (Amphibiens anoures). Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon. 1992;61:305-352.
  2. Frost DR. Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.0 [internet] 2019 [cited 14-07-2019]. Available from http://research.amnh.org/herpetol-ogy/amphibia/index.htmL. New York (USA): American Museum of Natural History.
  3. Angel F. Sur une espèce nouvelle de grenouille du Tonkin, appartenant au genre Rana. Paris (France):
  4. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle; 1928. p. 319-320.
  5. Bourret R. Notes herpétologiques sur l’Indochine française. XIV. Les batraciens de la collection du Laboratoire des Sciences Naturelles de l’Université. Descriptions de quinze especes ou variétés nouvelles. Hanoi (Vietnam): Annexe au Bulletin Général de l'Instruction Publique; 1937. p. 5-56.
  6. Guibé J. Catalogue des Types d'Amphibiens du Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris (France): Imprimerie Nationale; 1948.
  7. Stuart BL Amphibians and reptiles. In Duckworth JW, Salter RE and Khounboline K, Wildlife in Lao PDR. Status Report; 1999. p. 43-67.
  8. Che J, Hu JS, Zhou WW, Murphy RW, Papenfuss TJ, Chen MY, Rao DQ, Li PP, Zhang YP. Phylogeny of the Asian spiny frog tribe Paini (Family Dicroglossidae) sensu Dubois. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009;50:59-73.
  9. Nguyen SV, Ho CT, Nguyen TQ. Herpetofauna of Vietnam. Frankfurt am Main (Germany): Edition Chimaira; 2009.
  10. Stuart BL. Chapter five: Amphibians and Reptiles. In: Social Forestry and Nature Conservation in Nghe An Province. Pu Mat: a biodiversity survey of a Vietnamese Protected area. Hanoi (Vietnam): Labor and Social Publishing House; 2001. p. 61-72.
  11. Ngật LN, Quang HX. Kết quả bước đầu về thành phần loài ếch nhái, bò sát ở Khu Bảo tồn Thiên nhiên Pù Mát, tỉnh Nghệ An. Tạp chí Sinh học. 2001;23(3B):59-65.
  12. Quang HX, Thảo HN, Tuấn HA. Đa dạng thành phần loài và đặc điểm phân bố theo sinh cảnh Lưỡng cư – Bò sát vùng đệm Vườn Quốc gia Pù Mát. Những vấn đề nghiên cứu cơ bản trong khoa học sự sống định hướng nông lâm nghiệp miền núi; 2004. p. 857-860.
  13. Orlov NL, Poyarkov NA, Nguyen TT. Taxonomic notes on Megophrys frogs (Megophryidae: Anura) of Vietnam, with description of a new species. Russ J Herpetol. 2015;22(3):206-218.
  14. Gosner KL. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica. 1960;16:183-190.
  15. Altig RG. A primer for the morphology of anuran tadpoles. Herpetol Conserv Biol. 2007;2(1):71–74.
  16. Altig RG, McDiarmid RW. Bodyplan: Development and morphology (Tadpoles: The biology of anuranlarvae). Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press; 1999. p. 24-51.
  17. Dubois A. Keratodont formulae in anuran tadpoles: proposals for a standardization. J Zool Syst Evol Res. 1995;33:1-15.
  18. Roelants K, Jiang J, Bossuyt F. Endemic ranid (Amphibia: Anura) genera in southern mountain ranges of the Indian subcontinent represent ancient
  19. frog lineages: evidence from molecular data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004;31(2):730-40.
  20. Inthara C, Chuaynkern Y, Duengkae P, Grosjean S. The tadpole of Quasipaa fasciculispina (Inger, 1970) from southeastern Thailand, with the description of its buccal anatomy. Alytes. 2009;26(1-4):86-96.
  21. Fei L, Hu S, Ye C, Huang Y. Fauna Sinica. Amphibia. Volume 3. Anura Ranidae. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Science, Science Press; 2010.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2019 Array