China, competition, Southeast Asia, the US, 21st century


With the advantages of geostrategic location, socio-economics, in spite of existing many “hot spots” in terms of security, Southeast Asia became the disputed territory for the important influence of many major countries in the world, including both two powers and the two largest economies in the world – the US and China. The two countries are competing in the influence and leadership position in the Southeast Asia through the integration plans and different geopolitical approaches. Since the early 21st century, the relation between the US and China with Southeast Asia has had great developments. Although the two countries have a starting point of different strategies and tactics for Southeast Asia, both parties have many common interests in promoting cooperation with the region. Southeast Asia is peaceful, stable and prosperous in accordance with the common interest of the US and China. The article compares China and the US foreign policy and analyses the strategic competition between the two countries in Southeast Asia to clearly understand the strategic direction of foreign affairs as well as the influences of both the US and China to the situation of Southeast Asia for two decades of the early 21st century.


  1. Bert, Wayne (2003), The United States, China and Southeast Asian Security: A Changing of the Guard, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  2. Goh, Evelyn, Simon Sheldon W. (2008), China, the United States, and Southeast Asia: Contending Perspectives on Politics, Security, and Economics, Routledge, New York.
  3. Kaplan, Robert D. (2012), The Revenge of Geography: What the Map Tells Us About Coming Conflicts and the Battle Against Fate, Random House, New York.
  4. Mullen, Michael (2009), Remarks and Q & A at the Navy League Sea-Air-Space Exposition, Gaylord National Resort and Conference Center, National Habor, Maryland.
  5. Ngô Thị Bích Lan (2018), “Vai trò địa chính trị của khu vực Đông Nam Á đối với Hoa Kỳ những năm đầu thế kỷ XXI” [The geopolitical role of Southeast Asia region for the United States in the early twenty-first century]. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Cần Thơ, Việt Nam, No. 54 (3C), pp. 209-215.
  6. Pumphrey, Carolyn W. (2002), The Rise of China in Asia: Security Implications, Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College.
  7. Tarling, Nicholas, Chen Xin (2017), Maritime Security in East and Southeast Asia: Political Challenges in Asian Waters, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
  8. Thayer, Carlyle A. (2010), Southeast Asia: Patterns of Security Cooperation, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Australia.
  9. Thayer, Carlyle A. (2011), “Quyền lực mềm Trung Quốc chống lại sức mạnh thông minh Mỹ” [Chinese soft power is against American smart power]., (accessed on April 24, 2021).
  10. The US Energy Information Administration (2017), “World Oil Transit Chokepoints”,, (accessed on April 24, 2021).
  11. The US State Department (2006), United States Advisory Council Report, September 2006.
  12. The US White House (2010), National Security Strategy, Washington D.C., May 2010.
  13. The US White House (2006), “National Strategy for Combating Terrorism”,, (accessed on April 24, 2021).
  14. Trần Khánh (2002), “Vị thế địa - chính trị Đông Nam Á thập niên đầu thế kỷ XXI” [Southeast Asian geopolitical position in the first decade of the 21st century]. Tạp chí Cộng sản, Cơ quan lý luận chính trị của Ban Chấp hành Trung ương Đảng Cộng sản Việt Nam, No. 21, pp. 60-64.
  15. Trần Khánh, Hắc Xuân Cảnh (2021), “Xu hướng cạnh tranh chiến lược Mỹ - Trung ở Đông Nam Á dưới thời Tổng thống Joe Biden” [The trend of US-China strategic competition in Southeast Asia under President Joe Biden]. International Conference Proceedings: Asean-Major Power Relations under the 46th President of the United States of America. Viện Hàn lâm Khoa học xã hội Việt Nam. pp. 11-22.
  16. Weatherbee, Donald E. (2008), International Relations in Southeast Asia: The Struggle for Autonomy, 2nd edition, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., New York.