PHẢN HỒI CỦA GIÁO VIÊN VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG HỖ TRỢ HỌC TẬP (SCAFFOLDING) TẠI CÁC LỚP TIẾNG ANH CƠ BẢN THEO HÌNH THỨC HỌC KẾT HỢP
Vol. 134 No. 6A (2025), Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Huế: Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn
Vol. 134 No. 6A (2025)

PHẢN HỒI CỦA GIÁO VIÊN VỀ HOẠT ĐỘNG HỖ TRỢ HỌC TẬP (SCAFFOLDING) TẠI CÁC LỚP TIẾNG ANH CƠ BẢN THEO HÌNH THỨC HỌC KẾT HỢP

Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Huế: Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v134i6A.7500
Published 2025-01-20
Hai Thi Thanh Le
University of Foreign Languages, Hue University
Lệ Ninh Trần Thị
Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Huế, 57 Nguyễn Khoa Chiêm, Huế, Việt Nam
Quỳnh Như Nguyễn Hà
Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Huế, 57 Nguyễn Khoa Chiêm, Huế, Việt Nam
Ngọc Lan Lê Thị
Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ, Đại học Huế, 57 Nguyễn Khoa Chiêm, Huế, Việt Nam

Keywords

hoạt động hỗ trợ học tập
học kết hợp
dạy và học ngoại ngữ
phản hồi scaffolding
blended-learning
teaching and learning English
responses

Abstract

This article reports part of the findings on the implementation of scaffolding for students at tertiary level. The focus is on teachers’ responses to the practice of scaffolding at blended-learning basic English classes. Qualitative research with in-depth interview was applied, triangulated with the receive artifacts on LMS. Eight teachers in charge of the respective classes took part in the interview. Results shows that the implementation of scaffolding was different among different components of blended-learning. While the implementation of scaffolding was rather effective with synchronous modes of teaching, it was far from efficient with asynchronous one (LMS). The article ends with some suggestions for supplementing teachers with more training on methodology in the new teaching mode, on technology, and for the curriculum modification.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v134i6A.7500

References

  1. Amelia, R., Rofiki, I., Tortop, H. S., và Abah, J. A. (2020). Pre-service teachers' scientific explanation with e-scaffolding in blended learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 9(1), 33-40.
  2. Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2017). The impact of scaffolding and nonscaffolding strategies on the EFL learners’ listening comprehension development. Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447–456.
  3. Afitska, O. (2016). Scaffolding learning: Developing materials to support the learning of science and language by non-native English-speaking students. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 75–89.
  4. Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing students language skills through blended learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(3), pp223-232.
  5. Beyth-Marom, R., Saporta, K., & Caspi, A. (2005). Synchronous vs. asynchronous tutorials. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(3), 245–262.
  6. Bruner, J. S. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use words. New York: Norton.
  7. Brush, T. A., & Saye, J. W. (2002). A summary of research exploring hard and soft scaffolding for teachers and students using a multimedia supported learning environment. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2), 1-12.
  8. Clark, K. F., & Graves, M. F. (2005). Scaffolding students’ comprehension of text. The Reading Teacher, 58(6), 570–580.
  9. Conole, G., & Oliver, M. (2006). Contemporary perspectives in e-learning research: Themes, methods, and impact on practice. Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.
  10. Cooke, G. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.elucidat.com/blog/online-learning-vs-face-to-facelearning/ on 14 Jun 2022.
  11. Deschacht, N., & Goeman, K. (2015). The effect of blended learning on course persistence and performance of adult learners: A difference-in-differences analysis. Computers & Education, 87, 83–89.
  12. Dinh, H. (2016). The effectiveness of scaffolding in a blended learning course from students’ perspective. MA thesis, University of Oulu.
  13. Gherheș, V., Șimon, S., & Para, I. (2021). Analysing students’ reasons for keeping their webcams on or off during online classes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6).
  14. Graham, C. R. (2006) Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions, C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.
  15. Holton, D., & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International journal of mathematical education in science and technology, 37(2), 127-143.
  16. Kear, K., Chetwynd, F., Williams, J., & Donelan, H. (2012). Web conferencing for synchronous online tutorials: Perspectives of tutors using a new medium. Computers and Education, 58(3), 953–963.
  17. Koohang, A. (2009). A learner-centred model for blended learning design. International Journal of innovation and learning, 6(1), 76-91.
  18. Land, S. M., Hannafin, M. J., & Oliver, K. (2012). Student-centered learning environments: Foundations, assumptions and design. In Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 3-25). Routledge.
  19. Le Cunff, A. L. (2022). Distance learning, e-learning, online learning, or virtual learning. Retrieved from: Distance learning, e-learning, online learning, or virtual learning from https://nesslabs.com/distance-learning-e-learning-online-learning-virtual-learning-difference
  20. Nambiar, D. (2020). The impact of online learning during COVID-19: students’ and teachers’ perspective. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 8(2), 783-793.
  21. Nguyen, Q. N. (2022). Teachers' Scaffolding Strategies in Internet-Based ELT Classes. TESL-EJ, 26(1), n1.
  22. Puntambekar, S., & Hubscher, R. (2002). Scaffolding in complex learning environments: What we have gained and what we have missed. Educational Psychologist, 40, 1-12.
  23. Reingold, R., Rimor, R., & Kalay, A. (2008). Instructor's scaffolding in support of student's metacognition through a teacher education online course: a case study. Journal of interactive online learning, 7(2), 139-151.
  24. Ronen, M., & Langley, D. (2004). Scaffolding complex tasks by open online submission: Emerging patterns and profiles. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4), 39–61.
  25. Santoso, A. (2010). Scaffolding an EFL (English as a foreign language)‘effective writing’class in a hybrid learning community (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).
  26. Sawyer, R. K. (2005). The cambridge handbook of the learning sciences Cambridge University Press.
  27. Van Der Stuyf, R. R. (2002). Scaffolding as a teaching strategy. Adolescent Learning and Development, 52(3), 5-18.
  28. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
  29. Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English language learners: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159-180.
  30. Waterhouse, S. A. (2005). The power of elearning: The essential guide for teaching in the digital age. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
  31. Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48(3), 362-382.
  32. Yoo, S. J., & Huang, W. D. (2013). Engaging online adult learners in higher education: Motivational factors impacted by gender, age, and prior experiences. Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(3), 151–164.