ROLE DEVELOPMENT IN ONLINE EFL LISTENING CLASSES: A CASE STUDY IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN VIETNAM
Tập 133 Số 6B (2024), Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Tập 133 Số 6B (2024)

ROLE DEVELOPMENT IN ONLINE EFL LISTENING CLASSES: A CASE STUDY IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN VIETNAM

Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v133i6B.7402
Đã xuất bản 2024-05-09
Anh Hong Pham
Hue University of Foreign Languages

Tóm tắt

The roles of the teacher and students in online language classes have been a well-researched area, yielding various insights into the potentials of online technologies and the need for a consideration of re-defining classroom roles. Drawing on a case study, for particularities, this paper presents the results of an exploratory investigation into the development of classroom roles in an EFL Listening class integrating online technologies at a university. Teacher and student interviews and Zoom class observations were used as instruments for data collection. Findings from qualitative data analysis show two major issues. First, there was a critical development of the teacher’s roles and her students’ roles over a semester of listening instruction totally based on online technologies. Second, online technologies helped enable the development of roles, which otherwise was impossible. Among the discussion issues, an argument that can be raised concerns the relationship between teachers' and students' roles and identities. The paper implies a need to redefine classroom roles in higher education.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v133i6B.7402
PDF (English)

Tài liệu tham khảo

  1. References
  2. Alvarez, I., Guasch, T., & Espasa, A. (2009). University teacher roles and competencies in online learning environments: a theoretical analysis of teaching and learning practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 321-336.
  3. Anderson, T., Liam, R., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context.
  4. Badia, A., Garcia, C., & Meneses, J. (2017). Approaches to teaching online: Exploring factors influencing teachers in a fully online university. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1193-1207.
  5. Bennett, S., & Lockyer, L. (2004). Becoming an online teacher: Adapting to a changed environment for teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Media International, 41(3), 231-248.
  6. Berge, Z. L. (1995). Facilitating computer conferencing: Recommendations from the field. Educational technology, 35(1), 22-30.
  7. Birch, P. (2002). " E-learner competencies", Learning Circuits-ASTD Online Magazine. http://www. learningcircuits. org/2002/jul2002/birch. html.
  8. Chang, V., & Fisher, D. (2003). The validation and application of a new learning environment instrument for online learning in higher education. In Technology-rich learning environments: A future perspective (pp. 1-20).
  9. Collins, A. (1990). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Restructuring for learning with technology, 1990, 31-46.
  10. Coppola, N. W., Hiltz, S. R., & Rotter, N. G. (2002). Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. Journal of management information systems, 18(4), 169-189.
  11. Craig, A., Goold, A., Coldwell, J., & Mustard, J. (2008). Perceptions of roles and responsibilities in online learning: A case study. Interdisciplinary journal of e-learning and learning objects, 4(1), 205-223.
  12. Eick, C. J., & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry‐oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86(3), 401-416.
  13. Feagin, J. R., Orum, A. M., & Sjoberg, G. (Eds.). (2016). A case for the case study. UNC Press Books.
  14. Finkel, D. L., & Monk, G. S. (1997). Teachers and learning groups: Dissolution of the Atlas complex. MAA NOTES, 5-12.
  15. Goodyear, P., Salmon, G., Spector, J. M., Steeples, C., & Tickner, S. (2001). Competences for online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65-72.
  16. Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). Roles and domains to teach in online learning environments: educational ICT competency framework for university teachers. Changing Cultures in Higher Education: Moving Ahead to Future Learning, 339-353.
  17. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and instruction, 16(4), 431-473.
  18. Johnson, F., Delarche, M., Marshall, N., Wurr, A., & Edwards, J. (1998). Changing Teacher Roles in the Foreign Language Classroom. Texas papers in foreign language education, 3(2), 71-89.
  19. Kern, R., Ware, P., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Crossing frontiers: New directions in online pedagogy and research. Annual review of applied linguistics, 24, 243-260.
  20. Kinchin, I. (2004). Investigating students' beliefs about their preferred role as learners. Educational research, 46(3), 301-312.
  21. Lam, Y., & Lawrence, G. (2002). Teacher-student role redefinition during a computer-based second language project: Are computers catalysts for empowering change?. Computer assisted language learning, 15(3), 295-315.
  22. Lee, J. F., & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making Communicative Language Teaching Happen. Volume 1: Directions for Language Learning and Teaching. McGraw-Hill, Inc., 860 Taylor Station Rd., Blacklick, OH 43004-0545; toll-free: 800-722-4726.
  23. Nellen, T. (1999). Morphing from Teacher to Cybrarian. Multimedia Schools, 6(1), 20-25.
  24. Oliver, R. (2001). Assuring the quality of online learning in Australian higher education.
  25. Peterson, M. (1997). Language teaching and networking. System, 25(1), 29-37.
  26. Pickard, V. (1994). Concordancing for Schools: Problems and Potential.
  27. Reiman, A. J., & Peace, S. D. (2002). Promoting teachers' moral reasoning and collaborative inquiry performance: A developmental role-taking and guided inquiry study. Journal of moral education, 31(1), 51-66.
  28. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
  29. Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. (2010). Listen to each other: How the building of norms in an elementary science classroom fosters participation and argumentation.
  30. Salaberry, M. R. (1996). A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication. CALICO journal, 5-34.
  31. Salmon, G. (2000). Computer mediated conferencing for management learning at the Open University. Management learning, 31(4), 491-502.
  32. Smith, K., & Kolosick, J.T. (1996). The shift to a learner-centered university: New roles for faculty, students and technology. In Association of Small Computer Users in Education (ASCUE) Summer Conference Proceedings, North Myrtle Beach, SC, June 9±13 (pp. 146±157). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 405 829)
  33. Tudor, I. (1993). Teacher roles in the learner-centred classroom. ELT journal, 47(1), 22-31.
  34. Turner, R. H. (1978). The role and the person. American journal of Sociology, 84(1), 1-23.
  35. Varvel, V. E. (2007). Master online teacher competencies. Online journal of distance learning administration, 10(1), 1-41.
  36. Walker, C. L., & Shore, B. M. (2015). Understanding classroom roles in inquiry education: Linking role theory and social constructivism to the concept of role diversification. Sage Open, 5(4), 2158244015607584.
  37. Warschauer, M., Turbee, L., & Roberts, B. (1996). Computer learning networks and student empowerment. System, 24(1), 1-14.
  38. Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher's role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1-28.
  39. Wheeler, S. (2010). Open content, open learning 2.0: Using wikis and blogs in higher education. Changing cultures in higher education: Moving ahead to future learning, 103-114.
  40. Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford University Press, USA.