CƠ CHẾ TÀI CHÍNH CHO CÁC NHÓM BẢO TỒN CỘNG ĐỒNG VÀ TUẦN TRA THÔN BẢN TẠI CÁC XÃ VÙNG ĐỆM TỈNH QUẢNG NAM
PDF

Keywords

Bảo tồn, cộng đồng, cơ chế, tài chính, quản lý rừng, Quảng Nam Community, conservation, financial, patrol, regime

Abstract

Although financial regime has been concerned as one of the key factors affecting the success or failure of community based forestry management groups, most of the groups, especially in developing countries faced the challenges of limited financial sources to maintain and operate their duties. The overall objective is to identify and develop the financial regime for community based conservation and village patrol groups in Quang Nam province, so that those groups have efficient and effective contribution to the forest management and development. The study employed qualitative research methods by different tools: key informant interview, group discussion, in-depth interview, and validation workshop. The study found that most of groups have limited accessibility to the financial sources due to the expiration of state programs on forestry development, the lack of members’ cash contribution to the groups, and shortage of supports from donors. The opportunities to obtain financial source for groups’ operation might come from payment for Forestry environment services, support from District and Quang Nam Forest protection and Development Fund; and developing the livelihood models for groups. Two proposed methods for sustainable managing groups’ financial sources are developing micro credit to loan rotatedly among members and/ or establishing a group business model. The interest rate and return from those two models, respectively contribute to group financial sources and improve member income.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v130i6B.6249
PDF

References

  1. Baynes, J., et al., Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 2015. 35: p. 226-238.
  2. Schusser, C., Who determines biodiversity? An analysis of actors' power and interests in community forestry in Namibia. Forest Policy and Economics, 2013. 36: p. 42-51.
  3. Urech, Z.L., J.-P. Sorg, and H.R. Felber, Challenges for Community-Based Forest Management in the KoloAla Site Manompana. Environmental Management, 2013. 51(3): p. 602-615.
  4. Maraseni, T.N., et al., An assessment of governance quality for community-based forest management systems in Asia: Prioritisation of governance indicators at various scales. Land Use Policy, 2019. 81: p. 750-761.
  5. De Royer, S., M. Van Noordwijk, and J. Roshetko, Does community-based forest management in Indonesia devolve social justice or social costs? International Forestry Review, 2018. 20(2): p. 167-180.
  6. Camacho, L.D., et al., Economic aspects of community‐based forest management program as a strategy for forest landscape restoration in the Philippines. Forest Science and Technology, 2007. 3(2): p. 108-116.
  7. Mogaka, H., Economic aspects of community involvement in sustainable forest management in Eastern and Southern Africa. 2001: IUCN.
  8. Gurung, A., et al., Community-based forest management and its role in improving forest conditions in Nepal. Small-scale forestry, 2013. 12(3): p. 377-388.
  9. Watts, J.D., et al., Village transfers for the environment: Lessons from community-based development programs and the village fund. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019. 108(C): p. 1-1.
  10. Phú, H.P. Thành lập Nhóm bảo tồn cộng đồng tại một số xã vùng đệm các khu bảo tồn tỉnh Quảng Nam. 2019 [cited 2021 03/01].
  11. Hoàng, T.Q., H.L.P. Khanh, and P.V. Hùng, Xây dựng cơ chế tài chính cho các nhóm Bảo tồn cộng đồng và tuần tra thôn bản tại Quảng Nam. 2020, Chi cục kiểm lâm Quảng Nam: Tam Kỳ, Quảng Nam.
  12. Tole, L., Reforms from the ground up: a review of community-based forest management in tropical developing countries. Environmental Management, 2010. 45(6): p. 1312-1331.
  13. Emerton, L., J. Bishop, and L. Thomas, Sustainable Financing of Protected Areas: A global review of challenges and options. 2006: IUCN.
  14. Soedomo, S., Towards a Sound Financial Architecture for Sustainable Forest Management: The Role of National Forest Funds. 2013.
  15. Boscolo, M., K.v. Dijk, and H. Savenije, Financing sustainable small-scale forestry: lessons from developing national forest financing strategies in Latin America. Forests, 2010. 1(4): p. 230-249.
  16. Streck, C., Mobilizing finance for REDD+ after Paris. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 2016. 13(2): p. 146-166.
  17. Awe, A., Mobilization of domestic financial resources for agricultural productivity in Nigeria. Australian Journal of Business and Management Research, 2013. 2(12): p. 1.
  18. To, P.X., et al., The prospects for payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Vietnam: a look at three payment schemes. Human ecology, 2012. 40(2): p. 237-249.
  19. Hein, L., D.C. Miller, and R. De Groot, Payments for ecosystem services and the financing of global biodiversity conservation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2013. 5(1): p. 87-93.
  20. Savenije, H. and K. Van Dijk, Financing Strategies in National Forest Programmes. ETFRN News, 2008. 49: p. 50-55.
  21. Mazur, R.E. and O.V. Stakhanov, Prospects for enhancing livelihoods, communities, and biodiversity in Africa through community-based forest management: a critical analysis. Local Environment, 2008. 13(5): p. 405-421.
  22. Kaushal, K. and J. Kala, Nurturing Joint Forest Management through Microfinance: a Case from India. Journal of Microfinance/ESR Review, 2005. 7(2): p. 2.
  23. Datta, D., R. Chattopadhyay, and P. Guha, Community based mangrove management: a review on status and sustainability. Journal of environmental management, 2012. 107: p. 84-95.
  24. Chen, H., et al., Livelihood sustainability and community based co-management of forest resources in China: changes and improvement. Environmental management, 2012. 49(1): p. 219-228.
  25. Humphries, S., et al., Searching for win-win forest outcomes: Learning-by-doing, financial viability, and income growth for a community-based forest management cooperative in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development, 2020. 125: p. 104336.
  26. Kugonza, A., M. Buyinza, and P. Byakagaba, Linking local communities livelihoods and forest conservation in Masindi District, North Western Uganda. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 2009. 4(1): p. 10-16.
  27. Trần, T.N.H., Đánh giá hiệu quả giao khoán quản lý bảo vệ rừng và chi trả dịch vụ môi trường rừng tại Ban quản lý Rừng phòng hộ sông Tranh, tỉnh Quảng Nam. 2016, Trường Đại học Nông Lâm, ĐHH.
  28. Nguyễn, V.B., Tri thức bản địa trong quản lý tài nguyên rừng góp phần bảo tồn đa dạng sinh học tại cộng đồng dân tộc thiếu số vùng đệm Vườn Quốc gia Pù Mát, tỉnh Nghệ An: Luận văn Thạc sĩ khoa học Môi trường chuyên ngành Môi trường trong phát triển bền vững. 2014, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.
  29. Châu, Đ.T., et al. Đánh giá vai trò của lâm sản ngoài gỗ trong đời sống của cộng đồng ở khu vực khe bu, vùng đệm vườn Quốc gia Pù Mát. in Hội nghị khoa học toàn quốc về sinh thái và tài nguyên sinh vật lần thứ 5. 2015.
  30. Thuỷ, H.X. and Đ.X. Trường, Hệ thống khu bảo tồn do cộng đồng quản lý.