APPLYING ACTIVE TEACHING IN TEACHING THE COURSE “RECEPTION OPERATIONS” FOR FRENCH-MAJORED STUDENTS SPECIALIZING INTOURISM AT FACULTY OF FRENCH – RUSSIAN, UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, HUE UNIVERSITY
PDF (Vietnamese)

Keywords

phương pháp dạy học tích cực, nghiệp vụ lễ tân, sinh viên tiếng Pháp chuyên ngành Du lịch active learning methods, reception operations, French-major Tourism students

Abstract

 

This study presents the results of a survey on students’ and lecturers’ feedback regarding the application of active teaching methods, a learner-centered pedagogical approach, in the course reception operations. These methods provide students with opportunities to develop professional knowledge, French for specific purposes competence, and front office skills through practice-based activities embedded in authentic professional contexts.

The study was conducted with Tourism-major students from cohorts K17 and K18. The findings indicate that the implementation of active teaching methods enhances students’ learner autonomy, learning motivation, and learning effectiveness, while also producing significant improvements in their French professional language competence and front office operational skills.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v135i6C.8194
PDF (Vietnamese)

References

  1. Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining “gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040.
  2. Funahashi, H. (2015). 外国人学生の自律的な日本語学習を支えるしくみ―アクティブラーニングにおける位置づけ―. 鈴鹿大学紀要, 22, 63–77.
  3. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370000701798495.
  4. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative learning: Increasing college faculty instructional productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4.
  5. Kita, Y. (2019). ALを活用した初等中等外国語教育における授業観察の一考察―アクティブ・ラーニングと効果的なフィードバック―. 鳴門教育大学情報教育ジャーナル, 16, 17–20.
  6. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
  7. Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091.
  8. Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role play. Oxford University Press.
  9. Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational Leadership, 68(1), 34–37.
  10. Lebrun, M., & Lecoq, J. (2015). Classes inversées : Enseigner et apprendre à l’endroit !. Canopé éditions.
  11. Mizokami, S. (2014). アクティブラーニングと教授学習パラダイムの転換. 東信堂.
  12. Nguyễn Quý Thanh, & Nguyễn Trung Kiên. (2012). Tính tích cực học tập của sinh viên: Một phân tích về khoảng cách giữa nhận thức và thực hành. Tạp chí Tâm lý học, 8(161), 41–54.
  13. Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Xuân. (2016). Phát huy tính tích cực học tập của sinh viên trong dạy học các môn tâm lý học, giáo dục học đại cương. Văn hóa – Giáo dục – Nghệ thuật, 23, 28–32.
  14. Perrenoud, P. (1997). Construire des compétences dès l’école. ESF.
  15. Slavin, R. E. (1991). Student team learning: A practical guide to cooperative learning (3rd ed.). National Education Association.
  16. Võ Bình Nguyên. (2014). Tính tích cực học tập của sinh viên Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh: Nghiên cứu so sánh theo giới tính [Luận văn thạc sĩ, Viện Đảm bảo Chất lượng Giáo dục, Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội].
  17. Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916