ẨN DỤ NGỮ PHÁP TRONG PHÂN TÍCH DIỄN NGÔN VĂN BẢN HỢP ĐỒNG KINH TẾ THEO LÝ THUYẾT NGỮ PHÁP CHỨC NĂNG HỆ THỐNG

Keywords

Contracts, metaphors, discourse analysis, systematic functional grammar Ẩn dụ tư tưởng, hợp đồng kinh tế, ngữ pháp chức năng hệ thống, phân tích diễn ngôn

Abstract

Grammatical metaphor is one of the linguistic phenomena introduced by Halliday in his research on systemic functional grammar. This article analyzes ideological metaphors in Vietnamese economic contracts based on the theory of systemic functional grammar. The purpose of the article is to find out the features in ideological metaphors, ways expression, non-configure (metaphorical) and configure (non-metaphorical) forms. The research results show that the ideological metaphor in the contract is realized through the nominalization of phrasal verbs and the nominalization of clauses. And the nominalization of clause is much more dominant than the nominalization of phrasal verbs. Nominalization of phrasal verbs occurs in most transitivity processes. The nominalization of a clause includes three main cases, among which the nominalization of clause acting as a circumstance is much more dominant.

https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v131i6D.6710

References

  1. Bhatia, V. K. (1983). An applied discourse analysis of English legislative writing. Birmingham, UK: The University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.
  2. Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings: Routledge.
  3. Colombi, M. C. (2006). Grammatical metaphor: Academic language development in Latino students in Spanish. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 147-163). London: Continuum.
  4. Diep, Q. B. (2005). Ngữ pháp tiếng Việt [Vietnamese Grammar]. Ha Noi: Vietnamese Education Publisher.
  5. Fan, W. (2001). Theoretical study of grammatical metaphor. In: Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
  6. Galve, I. G. (1998). The textual interplay of grammatical metaphor on the nominalizations occurring in written medical English. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(3), 363-385.
  7. Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). An introduction to functional grammar (V. V. Hoang, Trans.). London: Edward Arnold.
  8. Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (Third ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
  9. He, Q. (2019). Grammatical Metaphor in Clause Combining. In A Corpus-Based Approach to Clause Combining in English from the Systemic Functional Perspective (pp. 127-175): Springer.
  10. He, Q., & Yang, B. (2014). A study of transfer directions in grammatical metaphor. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 34(3), 345-360.
  11. Hoang, V. V. (1999). Tìm hiểu bước đầu về bản chất của ẩn dụ ngữ pháp [A Preliminary Study on the Nature of Grammatical Metaphor]. The VNU Journal of Science, 3, 30-47.
  12. Maley, Y. (1994). The language of the law. Language and the Law, 1.
  13. Mellinkoff, D. (2004). The language of the law: Wipf and Stock Publishers.
  14. Qingshun, H. (2013). Rankshift Directions and Representations of Grammatical Metaphor. Journal of China University of Mining Technology, 1, 132-136.
  15. Ravelli, L. (2003). Renewal of connection. In Grammatical metaphors: Views from systemic functional linguistics (pp. 38-63): John Benjamins Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
  16. Taverniers, M. (2008). Interpersonal grammatical metaphor as double scoping and double grounding. Word, 59(1-2), 83-109.
  17. Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing functional grammar: Routledge.
  18. Tiersma, P. M. (2000). Legal language: University of Chicago Press.
  19. Trosborg, A. (1997). Rhetorical strategies in legal language: Discourse analysis of statutes and contracts (Vol. 424). Germany: Gunter NarrVerlag Tubingen.
  20. Yuliana, D. (2011). An investigation of grammatical metaphor in students’writing and its effects on the texts’written characteristics. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia,
  21. Zhu, Y. (2006). On nominalization, verbalization and grammatical metaphor. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 2, 83-90.